South Norfolk's population expanded in the decade leading up to the most recent census. At the same time there were changes in work life, religion and housing tenure.
The population passed 120,000
In the 10 years leading up to the latest census, the population of South Norfolk increased by 12%, from just under 111,000 to 124,000.
The addition of about 13,000 people means this area's population increased faster than the rate of growth across England (up 7.9% since the 2001 census).
In 2011, South Norfolk was home to, on average, 0.98 people per football pitch-sized piece of land.
Population density was lower than the average across Eastof England
Population density (usual residents per football pitch-sized piece of land) across Eastof England, March 2011 (larger dots represent greater increase since 2001)
- Rest of Eastof England
- South Norfolk
- Average across England
An older South Norfolk
Census 2011 data also show a change in the local population's average age.
Between the last two censuses, the median age of South Norfolk increased by two years, from 43 to 45 years.
This rural area had a higher average age than Eastof England and remained older than the average local authority area across England (39 years of age).
The rise in age was because of an increase of almost 5,100 people between the ages of 60 and 69 years, while the population between 30 and 39 years decreased by just over 1,000.
About 14% of people in South Norfolk are aged between 60 and 69 years
Percentage of usual residents in England, East and South Norfolk by 10 year age band, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Fewer people worked long hours
The percentage of employed people in South Norfolk working more than 49 hours in the week before the census decreased from 17% to 12% in the 10 years leading up to the latest census.
In 2011, just under 1 in 30 (3.0%) people aged 16 to 74 (in employment the week before the Census 2011) said they had worked less than 16 hours the previous week, compared with 2.0% in 2001.
The proportion of people working long hours fell at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 15% in 2001 to 11% in 2011). Across England, the percentage fell from 13% to 10%.
Long hour working in South Norfolk decreased by 4.4 percentage points
Percentage of usual residents aged 16 to 74 (in employment the week before the Census 2011) in South Norfolk, Eastof England and England that said they had worked over 49 hours the week before completing the census, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Religion in South Norfolk
The 2011 Census asked a voluntary question about religion. Of those who chose to disclose their religious affiliation, 31% said they had no religion. An increase from 17% in 2001 makes this the fastest-growing religious group in South Norfolk.
Across Eastof England, the percentage of people who described themselves as having no religion increased from 18% to 30%, while across England the percentage went from 16% to 27%.
Around 67% of those who disclosed their religion in South Norfolk said they were Christian, down from 82% in 2001. About 0.0% said they were Sikh, up from 0.0% 10 years prior.
The percentage of people who did not disclose their religious affiliation fell from 8.7% to 8.3% between the last two censuses.
In South Norfolk, 8.3% chose not to disclose their religious affiliation. In East the percentage was 7.9% and across England the percentage was 7.8%.
The population without a religion in South Norfolk increased by 13 percentage points
Percentage of usual residents in England, East and South Norfolk by religion, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Disability in South Norfolk
The percentage of South Norfolk residents whose day-to-day activities are limited a lot by a long-term health problem or disability increased from 2.6% to 3.4% in the 10 years leading up to the latest census.
The percentage who reported being limited a little in their day-to-day activities remained close to 7.9%, while the percentage of South Norfolk residents whose day-to-day activities are not limited by a long-term health problem or disability remained close to 89%.
The proportion of people who are considerably limited by a long-term health problem or disability increased at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 2.7% in 2001 to 3.4% in 2011). Across England, the percentage increased from 3.1% to 3.8%.
The proportion of people who are limited a lot by a long-term health problem or disability was lower than across Eastof England
Percentage of usual residents that reported being considerably limited in their day-to-day activities across local authority areas in Eastof England and the average across England, March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Rise in private renting
The percentage of privately rented homes increased in South Norfolk, but at a slower rate than across Eastof England.
In South Norfolk, the proportion of private renting increased from 7.6% in 2001 to 11% in 2011. During the same period, the regional proportion increased from 8.6% to 15%.
Across Eastof England, the share of privately rented homes increased from 8.6% to 15%.
The rate of social housing in South Norfolk remained close to 11%, while the rate of home ownership decreased from 78% to 75%.
Private renting in South Norfolk increased by 3.6 percentage points
Percentage of households in South Norfolk, Eastof England and England that rented privately, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Health improved
The percentage of South Norfolk residents that described their health as bad or very bad decreased from 7.6% to 4.5% in the decade to 2011.
Rates are standardised to account for variation in age, which can impact the local population's health.
In 2011, just over 8 in 10 (82%) said their health was good or very good, compared with 69% in 2001. The percentage of South Norfolk residents that described their health as fair decreased from 23% to 13%.
The proportion of residents that perceived their health as bad or very bad fell at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 7.6% in 2001 to 4.7% in 2011). Across England, the percentage fell from 9.1% to 5.5%.
These data are people’s own opinions in describing their overall health. They may be inconsistent with other measures of health, such as NHS records.
The percentage of people in ’bad’ or ’very bad’ health in South Norfolk decreased by 3.2 percentage points
Percentage of usual residents in South Norfolk, Eastof England and England said their health was bad or very bad, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
More people cohabiting
The percentage of households in South Norfolk, which comprised a cohabiting couple, increased from 8.2% to 11% in the decade leading up to the most recent census.
The percentage that had only one person remained close to 26%, while the percentage of households in South Norfolk which comprised a married couple (with or without children) decreased from 43% to 39%.
The proportion of households with an unmarried couple increased at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 8.8% in 2001 to 10% in 2011). Across England, the percentage increased from 8.3% to 9.9%.
The percentage of households with a cohabiting couple in South Norfolk increased by 2.4 percentage points
Percentage of households in South Norfolk, Eastof England and England that had an unmarried couple, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
More adults are separated from partners
The percentage of adults in South Norfolk that had divorced or separated from a married or civil partner increased from 9.7% to 12% in the decade to 2011.
In 2011, just under 6 in 10 (56%) people aged 16 and over said they were married, compared with 60% in 2001. The percentage of single people in South Norfolk increased from 22% to 25%.
The proportion of people who had divorced or separated from a married or civil partner increased at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 10% in 2001 to 12% in 2011). Across England, the percentage increased from 11% to 12%.
The proportion of people who had divorced or separated from a marriage or civil partner was lower than across Eastof England
Percentage of usual residents aged 16 and over that said they had divorced or broken up with a married or civil partner across local authority areas in Eastof England and the average across England, March 2011
- Rest of Eastof England
- South Norfolk
- Average across England
Ethnicity in South Norfolk
In 2011, 98% of the local population said they were from the White ethnic groups. An increase from 99% in 2001 makes this the fastest-growing ethnic group in South Norfolk.
Across Eastof England, the percentage of residents from the White ethnic groups fell from 95% to 90%, while across England the percentage went from 91% to 85%.
Around 1.0% of people in South Norfolk said they were from the Asian or Asian British ethnic groups, up from 0.4% in 2001. About 1.0% said they were from Mixed/multiple ethnic groups (White and Asian, White and Black African, White and Black Caribbean or Other Mixed), up from 0.5% 10 years prior.
The percentage of residents from the Black, Black British, Caribbean or African ethnic groups rose from 0.1% to 0.3% between the last two censuses.
The population from the White ethnic groups in South Norfolk decreased by 1.3 percentage points
Percentage of usual residents in England, East and South Norfolk by ethnicity, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Changing work life
The percentage of South Norfolk residents that were unemployed increased from 2.1% to 2.7% in the 10 years leading up to 2011.
The percentage who said they were employed remained close to 53%, while the percentage of South Norfolk residents that were self-employed increased from 11% to 12%.
The proportion of unemployed people increased at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 2.6% in 2001 to 3.8% in 2011). Across England, the percentage increased from 3.4% to 4.4%.
The rate of unemployment was lower than across Eastof England
Percentage of usual residents aged 16 to 74 that said they were unemployed across local authority areas in Eastof England and the average across England, March 2011
- Rest of Eastof England
- South Norfolk
- Average across England
Change in unpaid care provision
The percentage of South Norfolk residents that provided at least 50 hours of weekly unpaid care increased from 1.7% to 2.2% in the 10 years leading up to 2011.
The percentage who reported providing between 20 and 49 hours of unpaid care each week remained close to 0.9%.
The proportion of people providing 50 hours, or more, of weekly unpaid care increased at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 1.8% in 2001 to 2.2% in 2011). Across England, the percentage increased from 2.1% to 2.4%.
The proportion of people providing 50 hours, or more, of weekly unpaid care in South Norfolk remained close to 2.2%
Percentage of usual residents in England, East and South Norfolk by care, March 2001 and March 2011
- 2001
- 2011
Changes in family structure
The percentage of households in South Norfolk with only adult children living with their parents increased from 8.9% to 8.8% in the decade to 2011.
The percentage that had at least one dependent child remained close to 27%, while the percentage of households in South Norfolk without children remained close to 64%.
The proportion of households with adult children living with their parents increased at a similar rate to the figure for the whole of Eastof England (from 9.3% in 2001 to 9.6% in 2011). Across England, the percentage increased from 9.4% to 9.6%.
The proportion of households with only adult children living with their parents was lower than across Eastof England
Percentage of households where a parent lived with their adult children across local authority areas in Eastof England and the average across England, March 2011
- Rest of Eastof England
- South Norfolk
- Average across England
Area report data
Dataset one title
Dataset | 31 January 2022
This is a description of the dataset.
Dataset two title
Dataset | 16 January 2022
This is a description of the dataset.
Related links
Article one title
Article | 31 January 2022
This is a description of the article.
Article two title
Article | 16 January 2022
This is a description of the article.